Webinar
Find the missing losses in your solar plants with Wood and Enurgen, live November 17 or on replay
Register now
Technical PaperSolar Energy / SUNLAB / University of Ottawa

Optimal GCRs for HSAT, Fixed-tilt, and Vertical PV Systems for Latitudes up to 75°N

Diagram comparing ground coverage ratios across tracker configurationsGet the download

Abstract

Traditional PV array layout guidelines were designed for monofacial, fixed-tilt systems at low-to-moderate latitudes. Now that the market has progressed toward bifacial technologies, higher latitudes, and land-constrained areas, updated guidelines are more important than ever.

Here is a summary of key results from an analysis of ground coverage ratios (GCRs) for fixed-tilt, HSAT, and vertical arrays across 31 North American locations ranging from 17°N to 75°N.

  • Fixed-tilt systems span a wide GCR range of 0.15–0.68 compared to HSAT systems (0.17–0.32) and vertical systems (0.11–0.16).
  • Latitude is a stronger driver of inter-row energy yield shading losses than diffuse fraction. Higher latitude systems require lower GCR to maintain a specific inter-row loss.
  • Bifacial modules require GCRs approximately 0.03 lower than monofacial modules.

For more details, download the paper.

Erin M. Tonita, Annie C.J. Russell, Christopher E. Valdivia, Karin Hinzer

Optimal GCRs for HSAT, Fixed-tilt, and Vertical PV Systems for Latitudes up to 75°N

Get the download